What is equipoise in rct

Results   Among 371 randomized patients (mean [SD] age, [] years; 136 [%] women), 371 completed the trial. The proportion of patients with successful first-pass intubation did not differ significantly between the video laryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy groups (% vs %; absolute difference, −% [95% CI, −% to %]; P  = .60). The proportion of first-attempt intubations performed by nonexperts (primarily residents, n = 290) did not differ between the groups (% with video laryngoscopy vs % with direct laryngoscopy; absolute difference % [95% CI, −% to %]; P  = .76). The median time to successful intubation was 3 minutes (range, 2 to 4 minutes) for both video laryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy (absolute difference, 0 [95% CI, 0 to 0]; P  = .95). Video laryngoscopy was not associated with life-threatening complications (24/180 [%] vs 17/179 [%] for direct laryngoscopy; absolute difference, % [95% CI, −% to %]; P  = .25). In post hoc analysis, video laryngoscopy was associated with severe life-threatening complications (17/179 [%] vs 5/179 [%] for direct laryngoscopy; absolute difference, % [95% CI, % to %]; P  = .01) but not with mild to moderate life-threatening complications (10/181 [%] vs 14/181 [%]; absolute difference, −% [95% CI, −% to %]; P  = .37).

What is equipoise in rct

what is equipoise in rct

Media:

what is equipoise in rctwhat is equipoise in rctwhat is equipoise in rctwhat is equipoise in rctwhat is equipoise in rct

http://buy-steroids.org